Blog Posts‘The Help,’ Hilly Holbrook, and Cartoon Villainy

(Once again, here’s a gentle reminder/encouragement to donate to Boy Gets Girl if you can.)

Ever since The Help was made into a movie, I’ve been hearing about it all over the place. I featured the trailer of the film adaptation in my August Movies I Won’t be Seeing post and have read a lot of different commentaries on the text. After reading all of these commentaries, I felt torn about the text. I got a huge whiff of White Savior Rescues the Black Folk from the story, but I also liked that a story featuring women’s experiences was getting such good press. I finally decided to read the book myself and develop my own opinion.

Overall, I would say that I liked The Help. It was an engrossing, well-paced read. I also tend to like books with multiple narrators and I enjoyed reading the shifting perspectives of Aibileen, Minny, and Skeeter. I also liked that both Skeeter and Kathryn Stockett (in the book’s afterword) acknowledge the problematic aspect of a white woman telling black women’s stories for them. Skeeter doesn’t seem to have a White Savior complex. I think she actually acknowledges that her privilege allows her to express herself in a way that Aibileen and Minny can’t.

I did, however, have other problems with the book (major book spoilers ahead, so read no further if you don’t wish to be spoiled). The first problem has to do with the romanticizing of the black nanny/white charge relationship. The dynamic between Aibileen and “Baby Girl” Mae Moebly, as well as the dynamic between Skeeter and her nanny Constantine, was so sanitized that it made Scarlett O’Hara and Mammy look gritty and realistic in comparison. There were only two of these relationships in the book and both of them had these black maids loving these white children as much as they loved their actual children. I’m sure those types of relationships occasionally existed, but I would’ve liked to see a third character, say, resent the hell out of the white kid who took time away from their own kids, or at least not embody the perfect black mother stereotype and treat the raising of these white children like the job it was. For more on this topic, I highly recommend reading Dr. Bernestine Singley’s Sniffing Dirty Laundry: A True Story from The Help’s Daughter.

The other main problem I had with the story revolved around the story’s main antagonist, Hilly Holbrook. Continue reading

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Blog PostsGlee Season 3 Promo: Somebody Likes Me!

The promo for season three of Glee has been released:


Some of it looks like the same old, same old: slushies thrown at Gleek faces (because that joke hasn’t been run into the ground, no way), cafeteria antics, Will/Emma, Sue somehow being mean to the Glee club again even though they arranged the funeral for her sister and she was so moved…yawn.

BUT.

We also have the following:

1) Pink-haired Quinn walking down the hallway wearing black clothes and looking smokin’ hot and badass.

2) A part of a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it Cheerios dance routine with Blaine in the middle and Santana grinding on him.

Punk, counterculture Quinn? Blaine and Santana interaction?

Y’all. The Glee writers are TOTALLY READING MY BLOG.

…Crap. I guess I have to watch this season, huh?

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

Blog PostsSeptember Movies I Won’t Be Seeing (And a Few I Might)

Before I start writing about my September 2011 movies that I don’t want to see, I’d like to remind readers to donate, if they can, to the production of Boy Gets Girl by Harry Diesel productions. The production is much closer to its goal than it was a few days ago but still needs more money pledged. If you can’t donate, please consider telling your friends and family about this show.

Anyway, it’s the first of the month, which means I have more movies to not see! September kicks off the fall movie season and begins the year’s slow transition from mind-numbingly stupid popcorn fare to mind-numbingly stupid Oscar bait. As such, September movies tend to consist of an amusing mix of lowbow crap and pretentious crap. Let’s see what September 2011 has to offer!

First on the list is Straw Dogs, starring Kate Bosworth, Alexander Peter Stellan Sars-skarsgaard, and the cute brown-haired actor who is not the same guy who played Spike on Buffy the Vampire Slayer and just happens to have a very similar last name:

Summary: James Marsden-Marsters and Kate Bosworth are married and seem to have a loving relationship, showing easy, affectionate banter with each other. Too bad their relationship is about to go to shit because they return to Kate Bosworth’s hometown of Rapeville, Hickssissippi where her ex-boyfriend Blue-Collar Rape Boy totally wants to rape her, and so do his hick rapist friends! This causes problems in their relationship. Kate Bosworth feels violated, and James Marsters-Marsden feels like he’s going to turn into something he hates – namely, a violent blue-collar hick jerk, and he never thought that could happen to him because he’s a clean-cut city boy, and clean-cut city boys aren’t violent!

Predicted ending: Blue-Collar Rape Boy and his hick rapist friends attack the house in which James Marsden-Marsters and Kate Bosworth live. James Marsden-Marsters flips his shit and goes, “I’ve already been dumped for Brandon Routh, Patrick Dempsey, and Ryan Gosling, and now that a woman who isn’t Katherine Heigl finally prefers me to another guy, you’re trying to take her away from me? FUCK YOU, ERIC FROM TRUE BLOOD!” James Marsters-Marsden Becomes The Thing He Hates to save his wife, and Kate Bosworth gets to be a victim for two hours except for one ass-kicking moment where she shoots one of her would-be rapists…maybe.

My verdict: I don’t think this looks like a bad movie. It’s probably an affecting thriller. I just object, in principle, to a movie where the threat of rape against a woman is used as a plot device to start the character development of the male protagonist. Kate Bosworth’s feelings of violation are of some importance, but not as important as the fact that James Marsters feels bad that his wife is feeling violated. I find that problematic.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Blog Posts‘Boy Gets Girl’ Needs Your Help

How do you tell the difference between a lovelorn romantic and a stalker?

Sometimes you can’t…or sometimes, your gut tells you that something is wrong with this other person, but you rationalize the person’s actions as being socially awkward but well-meaning.

Or, your gut tells you something is wrong with this other person, and you know better not to rationalize it, but when you express your fears to your friends, your friends tell you that you’re overreacting and being paranoid. You respect your friends’ opinions, and frankly, believing that you’re the one overreacting is more comforting, and easier, than thinking you have an actual stalker.

Besides, how can you really tell? What if your senses are just in overdrive because you can’t trust people easily?

A few days ago, I read Boy Gets Girl, a play by Rebecca Gilman, that explores this very issue. It’s a suspenseful, thought-provoking play that also uses humor to highlight a serious issue. The play thoughtfully examines how men and women – and men and other men, and women and other women – relate to each other. I was engrossed throughout the reading of the play, and I would love to see it brought to life.

Fortunately, I might have that chance sometime soon. The play was brought to my attention by Kate Dulcich, a producer with a vision and commitment to this show. She’s putting on a production of Boy Gets Girl in Manhattan. It’s a very worthwhile project, but right now it doesn’t have the funding it needs to be produced.

If you have the means, I strongly urge you to pledge whatever you can to make this production a reality. You can learn more at the kickstarter site here => Boy Gets Girl.

This is a play that needs to be seen. It tackles an important issue and challenges our preconceived notions about the way men and women relate to one another, and doesn’t sacrifice character or storytelling to make its very important point. I also think it’s important to support new playwrights, directors, and producers so that the theatre world can continue to grow.

Consider pledging money if you have the ability to do so. You’ll be contributing to an important play and helping a worthwhile production get its footing.

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

Blog PostsOn Reviewing Movies I Haven’t Seen

Every month, I review movie trailers in posts called “[Name of Month] Movies I Won’t be Seeing.” Sometimes I’ll throw in a trailer for a movie I do want to see as a compare/contrast. In any case, I’ve received a few comments from people in the real world concerning these posts (because I do interact with the real world and don’t just play on the computer all day, Mom.) I have a few friends who cite the “movies I won’t be seeing” posts as their favorite feature on my blog. Others have expressed confusion about these posts, and I’ve had the following conversation a few times:

FRIEND/READER: You’re judging a movie before you even see it.
ME: …Yeah. That’s the whole point.

But to be fair, I understand why these reviews might confuse people. Part of the reason I write this blog is to dig deep into issues concerning feminism and entertainment. I analyze issues from different angles, approach subjects in different ways, and try to make more than the shallow observation. With the “movies I won’t be seeing” posts, deep analysis and second thoughts go out of the window and I make quick, rash judgments. I do as little research as possible into the actual movie and judge the quality of the film purely on its trailer.

So, why do I do these posts? What is the purpose of this activity?

1. Often enough, a trailer is all I need to see if a movie is crap. I don’t need to see the actual film to tell that The Change-Up is a misogynistic piece of garbage. The entire premise of the movie is about guys trying to get laid while in each other’s bodies, and one man actually says about the other’s wife, “I’m going to ruin her.” The premise, and that line in particular, are both incredibly rapey. I don’t need to see more than two minutes to determine that the movie is sexist, and also not funny.

2. Marketing earns its own criticism. Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that The Change-Up is really an excellent movie that actually criticizes rape culture and goes into deep, yet funny, analysis of consent issues. (I will eat a whole plateful of crow if this turns out to be the case, but let’s go with this idea for argument’s sake.) The people marketing the movie are still choosing to present the movie as a lowbrow douchebro comedy. Let’s also say, for argument’s sake, that The Help is more than a feel-good movie (for white people) about Magical Negroes and Mammies who suffer in saintlike ways until a white woman comes by to save them. (I’m 5% through the book on my Kindle, and right now, I’m not optimistic on that front. I’ll probably be blogging about The Help in more detail next week.) If the book/movie has more to it than that, I certainly couldn’t tell based on the trailer.

Bottom line: if the marketing people choose to put together a trailer that makes the movie seem like it’s chock full of insulting stereotypes and cliches, it’s because they think people will pay to see movies filled with insulting stereotypes and cliches. That’s a problem in of itself, even if the actual movie is good (see: Tangled.)

3. Sometimes I’m wrong and I think that’s funny. I wrote a whole commentary on the movie Take Me Home Tonight describing the relationship between Topher Grace and Kristen Stewart’s character, wishing Topher Grace would end up with Anna Faris instead. Shortly after posting, a few readers posted comments informing me that a) Topher Grace and Anna Faris’s characters were twins, not platonic best friends, and b) the actress I had thought was a blonde Kristen Stewart was actually Theresa Palmer. I could have gone back to the original post and made hasty edits, but those mistakes of mine amused the hell out of me, so I left them in there.

I also made a more egregious mistake in that same post, ranting about Thor’s whiteness and how we never see colorblind casting, not realizing that Idris Elba’s character was actually white in the comics. Oops. But I also left that mistake in there and let the comments that corrected me stand as well. I’m not perfect, I don’t pretend to be, and there is a risk of making completely wrong judgments if I just view a film’s trailer and nothing else. If I make a mistake, I’m going to let it stand to show my own fallibility.

Really, though, I just have fun ripping apart the shitty trailers I see. It’s my own short MS3TK. I enjoy doing it and might even do them on a bi-weekly basis starting in the fall. We’ll see.

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged , | 6 Comments

Blog PostsLessons in Funny Feminism from my Littlest, Tallest Little Brother

I was away on vacation when my youngest brother turned sixteen, so this post is a little late, but I wanted to talk about the youngest and tallest member of my family.

My youngest brother is growing up to be a pretty cool kid. He’s active in several different activities, a creative soul, and a funny person who enjoys making people laugh. One of my favorite aspects of watching him grow up is noticing how he obviously and openly respects women, women’s experiences, and women’s opinions.

This respect manifests in a few ways. Despite being a rather stubborn person who doesn’t always take criticism well (sorry, kid- it’s the truth!), he listens to me and my mother if we attempt to offer him advice. I also notice with pleasure that he seems to make female friends pretty easily. I don’t recall him ever having a “girls are icky” phase, or not wanting to play with girls or be friends with girls. He seemed to be happy whenever he made a new friend, and whether the new friend was a girl or a boy was irrelevant to him.

I can’t speak too much about his personal life, though – he wouldn’t want me to, for one thing, and I also don’t know too much about his friendships. I will, however, make some observations about his viewing patterns and his choices of entertainment.

A few summers ago, I watched some of Buffy the Vampire Slayer with my brother. I was in the middle of re-watching the whole series and was caught in the middle of season four. I say “caught” because season four is by far my least favorite season of the series – way too much Riley Finn and the Initiative and ugly, ugly sets and costumes and lighting – but watching it with a new viewer made the season more palatable to me.

Now, I had recently watched a few episodes with my then-boyfriend, and while he enjoyed the show to a point, he would occasionally make the observation that the male characters on Buffy were only there to serve the female characters and didn’t get many storylines of their own. I humored that observation at the time, even though I was thinking, “First of all, that’s just plain inaccurate, and second of all, welcome to how women feel in just about every male-centric story ever written.”

I did notice, though, that a lot of the male fans of Buffy I knew cited Spike, or Angel, or Giles, as their favorite characters in the show. They liked Spike and Angel because they kicked ass, or Giles because he was the wittiest character on the show. (Interestingly, none of them liked Xander nearly as much as I did.) I understood where they were coming from, because I was also a big fan of Spike and Giles, and grew to like Angel once he got his own show.

My brother, however, was the first male viewer I knew who was all about Buffy.

He didn’t even comment that much on Buffy’s hotness or sexiness or the things that guys are “supposed” to talk about, either. He just thought Buffy was cool. He sat forward in his seat and cheered her on whenever a fight scene came on. I heard enthusiastic cries of “Go, Buffy!” several times an episode. He didn’t think Buffy was cool “for a girl character.” He thought Buffy was cool, period. (Willow and Spike were close second favorite.)

But his respect for Buffy extended beyond an appreciation of her ass-kicking abilities. When we watched one of my least favorite episodes of all time, “Doomed,” we sat through several excruciating scenes where Riley lectures Buffy about why she’s stupid for not wanting to go out with him, despite knowing very little about her history or her responsibilities. (Disclaimer: I am the opposite of a Riley fan.) During these interminably long scenes, my brother, with no prompting from me, said, “He’s disrespecting her. He doesn’t even know what she does or what being the Slayer means.”

I cannot tell you how proud I was to see him come up with that observation all by himself. It seems like such a little thing – Buffy’s just a television show, right? But it was a little thing that spoke to something bigger. My brother recognized that Riley was lecturing Buffy about Buffy’s experiences, that a character was ‘splaining the other character’s life instead of listening and asking questions, and he recognized that this was the wrong thing to do.

I’ve also enjoyed watching his reactions to horror movies. We watched the original Scream trilogy together and he had an interesting take on all of the murder scenes. I noticed that murder scenes involving male characters were often quick and relatively bloodless, while murder scenes involving female characters were drawn out, probably because the audience gets off on watching a woman run for her life. My brother had a different perspective on those scenes. He commented, “The guys don’t even try to fight back. The killer gets them so easily. At least the girls try to put up a fight. They’re stronger.” And while I don’t think that was the intent of the filmmakers, I still thought it was neat that he took that message away from the movies.

My brother is a pretty neat kid because he’s quite a well-rounded person. He enjoys playing sports and playing music to an equal degree, and he’s just as likely to pick up a video game as he is to make a cheesecake. He doesn’t limit himself to either stereotypically masculine or stereotypically feminine activities, and he’s not likely to turn down a movie or book because it has a female protagonist. If anything, the presence of a strong female character is likely to appeal to him. He’s growing up quite nicely and I’m very proud of him – though that won’t stop me from stealing his dessert.

Posted in Blog Posts | 7 Comments

Blog PostsBlainetana Forever!

Apparently, Ryan Murphy knows how to keep people talking about Glee even during hiatus. All of the reports about Glee graduating the kids at the end of next season…no wait, they’re actually just graduating Finn, Rachel, and Kurt…no wait, those three are actually getting a spinoff…no wait, actually there’s no spinoff after all!…have been making my head spin.

Now it appears that there’s no spinoff after all, and a lot of Glee fandom has a big sad. I, on the other hand, am relieved. I never liked the idea of a Finn/Rachel/Kurt spinoff. A spinoff with Rachel is only fun if she doesn’t have Finn dragging her down and experiencing New York. A spinoff with just Rachel and Kurt is slightly preferable, but I’m still not overly fussed about the idea for a few reasons: 1) I can’t imagine Ryan Murphy would be able to sustain a “Rachel and Kurt living in New York” premise after, say, three episodes. 2) Too much Lea Michele. I can only handle her in small doses. 3) I enjoy the Rachel-Kurt friendship to a point, but I don’t like that Rachel appears to have taken the place of Mercedes at Kurt’s best friend. 4) Rachel and Kurt are too similar to each other, and a BFF sitcom doesn’t always work when the characters are so similar.

I think best-buddy sitcoms work best when characters are a little more different. That’s why I wouldn’t watch a Kurt-Rachel spinoff, but I would certainly watch a spinoff all about Blaine and Santana.

This might give some people pause, as these characters have had very little interaction on the show, but I want to give them more interaction on the show. I’m convinced magic will happen.

Why?

1) Blaine’s dapper wholesomeness + Santana’s in-your-face bitchiness = comedy gold. Let me be clear and say that I do not want to see Blaine become Santana’s Wise Gay Yoda Who Helps Her Come To Terms With Her Sexuality. I don’t want Santana softening up that much. But I can envision Santana just deciding that she wants to be friends with Blaine because she finds his backwards dapper behavior somehow endearing, if odd and also annoying, and being aggressive in a way that flummoxes him. I imagine Santana demanding – not asking, demanding – Blaine for help with a song to serenade Brittany, and being completely rude about it, while Blaine is taken back, and the idea of Blaine’s utter bewilderment in the face of Santana’s aggressive bitchiness/friendliness just cracks me up. I can see Santana taking interest in becoming friends with a boy who a) isn’t going to ever be sexually interested in her, and b) can’t compete with her divaness like Kurt, but not sure how to become friends with someone without being demanding. And Blaine would just go along with it at first out of amusement, and because he’d be a little scared of her. The idea just plain makes me laugh.

2) A new meaning for “new directions.” I’ve seen the “gay white guy and Jewish girl best friend” sitcom before (even if Kurt is closer in personality to Jack McFarland than Will Truman). I’m fairly certain I’ve never seen a show where the protagonist best friends were a half-Filipino gay boy and a Puerto Rican-American lesbian. Yay for diversity! Okay, so the actors aren’t actually gay, but that character combination still hasn’t been done before.

3) They’re both really good-looking. I can be shallow. I’m okay with this.

4) They sound great together. How would I know? I had the pleasure of seeing Darren Criss’s concert on Irving Street last month, and he brought out Naya Rivera as one of his guests. Behold their duet of “Valerie.”

There you have it. I want to see Blaine and Santana develop a friendship next season on Glee. I’m (half)-joking about the spinoff, but I think it would be much more entertaining than a Kurt-Rachel spinoff. Kurt can still be on Blaine and Santana’s Untitled Sitcom, but the other main romantic relationship on the show would be Santana/Brittany instead of Finn/Rachel. I don’t see any bad here.

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | 6 Comments

Blog PostsAugust Movies I Won’t be Seeing

August 2011 is going to be a big month for me. (I’ll be vague and just say that I have a <i>lot</i> to do.) Fortunately, very few movies are coming out that actually capture my interest in any way. I’ll have plenty of time to take care of personal stuff because movies won’t be able to distract me. Thanks, August 2011!

First on the Not-See List is The Change-Up, starring actors who I am now embarrassed to have ever found attractive or appealing:

Summary: In an adult male version of Freaky Friday, two douchebags switch bodies after they pee in a fountain (no, really) and wacky hijinx ensue. “Wacky hinjinx” meaning, of course, these doucheturds showing a complete lack of respect for consent by lying to women about who they are in order to sleep with them. Because that’s not rape at all! Isn’t it curious that the women in the Freaky Friday movies were extremely uncomfortable with the idea of men pursuing them while they weren’t in their own bodies, while the men in The Change-Up can’t wait for the opportunity to lie to the women they want to bang! That must be because men are really disgusting pigs, and not because movie executive and misogynists like to portray men as disgusting pigs because that stereotype sells (for some reason).

Predicted ending: The men will just barely avoid having sex with other women while in each other’s bodies, and that will Make Everything Okay. Oh, and they’ll probably learn some message about respect and the grass being greener on the other side and junk. The audience will probably miss that lesson, though, and more likely remember the lesson that male bodily functions are LOL-worthy and female bodily functions are OMG GROSS!!!

My verdict: I will miss this movie, buy a time machine, and go back in time just so I can miss it twice. Also, Jason Bateman is SO VERY on notice. He hasn’t yet made me want to buy a time machine so I can forget about having ever seen Arrested Development, but I’m slowly getting to that point.

Continue reading

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Reviews‘A League of Their Own’: A Feminist Classic

Last night, I watched A League of Their Own for the bajillionth time. It was one of my favorite movies as a kid and it remains one of my favorite movies as an adult. When I was a wee lass, I loved the movie because it was about girls playing baseball and the sports montages were exciting and fun. (Also, “There’s no crying in baseball!”) Watching the movie again as an adult alerted me to the different layers of feminism that makes it a classic. There are three aspects in particular that I want to discuss.  Continue reading

Posted in Reviews | Tagged | 12 Comments

ReviewsAll’s Well that Ends Well? Not Quite.

I recently attended the production of Shakespeare’s All’s Well that Ends Well at the Delacorte Theater in Central Park. I usually try to read the play before seeing the production, but I forgot to do that in this case. Hearing that the play is considered one of Shakespeare’s “problem plays,” I asked my mom for a brief summary. She told me that the play was considered problematic because the heroine, a resourceful, kind woman named Helena, spends the entire play mooning after a cad who doesn’t deserve her. When she manages to land him at the end of the show, the audience is left wondering why she wanted him so badly in the first place.

After seeing Helena and Bertram in action, I saw that problem immediately. Unfortunately, All’s Well that Ends Well is problematic for other reasons in addition to that one.

First, the play seems to imply that women are angels and men are animals. Helena accepts Bertram’s disdain for her because she can’t conceive of receiving better treatment from him. As pointed out in this review from The TheatreSource,

“But Helena continues to love Betrtam despite his flaws, seemingly resigned to the fact that he s a man and men will be cads. This is a familiar sentiment, given the recent public sexual scandals and discussions of wives that stand faithfully by their husbands.”

So true. I despise the idea that men just can’t help themselves from being horny jerks.

Of course, by the end of the play, Bertram realizes what a jerk he’s been this whole time and looks at Helena with new eyes. Bully for him. He learns that he should not have treated Helena so poorly. That’s a good lesson to learn. And yet, while watching the play progress, I often felt sorrier for Bertram than I did for Helena.

Because even though I understood that Helena is a good person, even though I understood that Bertram is immature and foolish, I could not get around the fact that Bertram is forced to marry someone against his will. And I don’t think anyone should ever have to marry someone against his will no matter WHAT his reasons are.

Essentially, Helena pulls out the version of the Grand Romantic Gesture that I can’t stand, the one that puts public pressure on someone to accept a romantic offer. Helena chooses Bertram for her husband right after she saves the king’s life. There’s no way Bertram can refuse her without looking like the world’s biggest tool, and that’s a terrible position to be put in. Look at how people felt like they had the right to criticize Mila Kunis because she didn’t immediately accept an offer of a date made by a total fucking stranger. “Come on, Mila, do it for your country! This guy’s done so much for America!” “Come on, Bertram. Marry Helena. She’s done so much for the king!”

I mean this as a criticism of the play itself, not of this particular production. I thought the production was lovely and well-paced and the actors strong. Still, I can see exactly why this is considered a “problem play.” The characters show a fundamental lack of respect for the idea of consent.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged | 4 Comments