Reviews100-Word Movie Review (Oscar Edition): “Albert Nobbs”

Albert Nobbs

Cast: Glenn Close, Janet McTeer, Mia Wasikowska

Summary: A woman lives as a man in Ireland to protect himself and earn enough money to purchase his own shop. He meets another woman living as a man, and entertains thoughts of marriage.

100-Word Review: A decent, sometimes good, movie falls short of being a great one. Janet McTeer’s performance is flawless and entirely natural, but while Glenn Close does a convincing job as a man, she doesn’t often do a convincing job as a person. I never felt her disappear into the role. Except for the scenes between Albert and Hubert, I think the movie succeeds more as an intellectual exercise than as a powerful story about emotion and the human condition. (Also, as a fan of Sarah from Upstairs, Downstairs, I was delighted to see Pauline Collins as a fussy, judgmental hotel manager.)

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reviews100-Word Movie Review (Oscar Edition): “The Iron Lady”

The Iron Lady

Cast: Meryl Streep, Jim Broadbent, Meryl Streep’s makeup

Summary: An aging Margaret Thatcher, struggling with Alzheimer’s, looks back on her life and career and husband.

100-Word Review: The audience is told several times that it’s Hard To Be A Woman In Politics – in case you didn’t know that – in a poorly directed missed opportunity that glosses over the most interesting parts of Thatcher’s career (the Falkland Islands invasion, being overthrown by her party) to focus on her struggle with dementia, and didn’t even tell that story well. Several editing and directorial choices are unintentionally hilarious and laughably bad, and I heard Streep’s Julia Child voice slip through her Margaret Thatcher voice several times. If she wins her third Oscar for this performance, it will be an embarrassment.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reviews“10 Things I Hate About You” Replaces One Problematic Trope with Another, but is Still Awesome

The Rom-Com Project is still on, and the theme for February is “Deception.” I’m going to look at romantic comedies that include deception and lying as a major plot point.

You’re familiar with this trope, I’m sure. One character (usually the man) pursues the female lead in a romantic fashion, but he has an ulterior motive. As the man and woman spend more time together, however, the man falls for the woman in earnest. Near the end of the film, the woman learns that the man has been deceiving her. They have a fight and she wants nothing more to do with him, but at the end, she forgives him and the two people begin a relationship.

I can’t imagine that this happens very often in real life. The deceit part, sure – people lie to each other all the time. The forgiveness part is much harder to swallow. Why would anyone who discovered that a romantic partner was a lying liarpants want to continue a relationship with said romantic partner, except to rush the predetermined Happy Ending that everyone wants to see?

I thought about this issue when watching 10 Things I Hate About You for the first time in years.

Let me clear about something: I love this movie. I love the chemistry between Julia Stiles and (sob!) Heath Ledger, I love the witty dialogue, I love Joseph Gordon-Levitt and David Krumholtz, I love Allison Janney as the romance novel-writing guidance counselor, and I love that the Baptista character is now a paranoid ob/gyn who can’t stand the idea of his daughters dating because he’s paranoid that they’ll get pregnant.

At the same time, I can’t ignore the fact that the premise of 10 Things I Hate About You is a little problematic.

Based on The Taming of the Shrew, the movie centers on Katarina Stratford, a sarcastic, vocally feminist high school senior whom other students refer to as “the shrew” or a “heinous bitch.” Two different boys want to date Kat’s younger sister Bianca, a popular, more stereotypically feminine sophomore, but there’s a catch: Bianca isn’t allowed to date until Kat does. Their father, an obstetrician who seems to work with primarily underprivileged young women, is terrified that one of his daughters will become pregnant, and institutes the unfair rule as a way to protect Bianca. The boys then conspire with (and against) each other to pay a tough, seemingly violent senior named Patrick Verona to date Kat so one of them can date Bianca. Patrick is then faced with the task of pursuing Kat and winning her over, but soon finds himself falling for her in earnest, as Kat softens up to him and opens her heart for the first time in ages.

This is a prime example of the “deception turns into love” trope. Patrick learns everything he can about Kat before pursuing her and pretends to be interested in her before he’s actually interested in her. Near the end, she discovers his deception and cuts off ties with him, but after a romantic gesture on his part, they’re back together and all is forgiven.

If you think about it too hard, the movie seems problematic – yet it’s downright progressive when compared to the source material.

In Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew, Petruchio pursues Katherina with money as his end goal, but there’s no real deception involved. Marriage was considered a contract more than an expression of love, so the idea that Petruchio would marry a woman for her money was not thought to be mercenary, but merely practical. Therefore, the “deception” trope doesn’t really apply. What does apply is the “domestic abuse is hilarious” trope, where Petruchio starves Katherina and performs acts of physical abuse, all in the name of wacky hijinx and hilarity!

10 Things I Hate About You wisely avoids all of those problematic elements. If anything, this movie is less The Taming of the Shrew than A Hot Guy Thinks He Has to Tame a Shrew But Discovers the Shrew is Actually an Awesome, Independent Girl.

Still – Kat discovers Patrick’s lie fifteen minutes before the end of the movie, and she forgives him and takes him back in the last scene of the film, all because he buys her a guitar and tells her that he fell for her.

On the one hand, it’s a really sweet scene, because we learn that Patrick bought the guitar with the money Joey had paid him to date Kat in the first place. He’s making amends by turning something negative into something positive.

On the other hand, we haven’t forgotten that Joey, the boy who paid Patrick in the first place, was not only a sarcastic, egotistical thorn in Kat’s side, but the boy who slept with her in ninth grade and then dumped her for not wanting to have sex with him again.

I don’t know if Kat told Patrick about what Joey did to her in ninth grade. If she did, that would make her forgiveness much harder to understand. If she didn’t – well, I’d still say that the resolution is a little problematic. That kind of betrayal would be hard to forgive in a real-life context. Can you imagine someone saying, “I was just pretending to like you before, but now I really like you! Be my girlfriend!” and have that work? I don’t think so.

Yet, somehow, I still buy it.

Maybe I buy it because of the poem Kat reads right before she discovers the guitar in her car, where she reveals that she still cares for Patrick even though she knows she shouldn’t – after all, love is rarely logical.

Or maybe I buy it because of Patrick himself. I have a theory that this movie works better depending on when you start to see Patrick genuinely falling for Kat. If you think he likes her in earnest later in the film, you’re less likely to buy their relationship than if you see him enjoying her company from the beginning. Personally, I think his appreciation for her grows as the movie goes on, but his initial moment of attraction occurs during their second interaction, when he watches her slam into Joey’s car – the grin on his face is pretty revealing.

Or maybe it’s a simple matter of chemistry, and Heath Ledger (sob!) and Julia Stiles have more chemistry than most romantic comedy couples I’ve seen, and I forget about any problematic elements the movie has when I’m watching them.

For whatever the reason, I believe her when she forgives him and wants to take him back.

It helps that the movie has some other neat feminist elements that make me happy.

No, I’m not pleased that Bianca and Cameron get away scot-free with deceiving Kat and we never have a scene with Bianca apologizing to her sister, and I don’t like that Cameron is presented as the good guy of the piece when he seems wholly unconcerned that Kat almost got a concussion at the party. I can’t take Cameron’s pining for Bianca that seriously when he just met her, and I’m disconcerted that Kat’s best friend doesn’t seem to have a problem with her new boyfriend setting up her best friend. (I’m also disconcerted about the number of ambiguous nouns in that last sentence.)

BUT, I love that Kat manages to find a happy place between her ninth-grade persona of trying too hard to be popular and her twelfth-grade persona of trying too hard to be part of the counterculture. I love that the well-intentioned dad who tries to control his daughters’ sexuality eventually realizes that he needs to let them decide how to live their own lives. I love that Bianca stands up for her boyfriend, her sister, and herself against the boy who wanted to use her for one thing and then discard her. I love that both of the two girls are encouraged to stand up for what they believe and are (eventually) commended for doing so.

In short, 10 Things I Hate About You changes the “domestic abuse is funny!” trope to the “deception turns to romance” trope. While both tropes are problematic, the second is the lesser of two evils, and I think the movie mostly succeeds as a feminist text as well as an entertaining one. I mean, how many romantic comedies and teen movies have their two lead characters talk about The Feminine Mystique?

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Reviews100-Word Movie Review (Oscar Edition): “Moneyball”

Moneyball

Cast: Brad Pitt, Jonah Hill, Philip Seymour Hoffman

Summary: The manager of the Oakland Athletics hires a “numbers man” to develop a new way of revamping their struggling team.

100-Word Movie Review: Moneyball is the least sentimental sports movie I can remember seeing, an interesting look at economic privilege and the way managers struggle to level the playing field of a losing game. Any non-Yankee fan would appreciate the searing commentary on the way that team’s payroll dominates professional baseball. Brad Pitt gives a solid, engaging lead performance, while Jonah Hill earned a Best Supporting Actor nomination for, essentially, not playing the same part he always does and doing a semi-decent job of it, though I can think of at least six actors who should have been nominated in that category instead.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Reviews100-Word Movie Reviews (Oscar Edition): “Hugo”

Hugo

Cast: Asa Butterfield, Chloe Grace Moretz, Ben Kingsley, Sacha Baron Cohen, Ray Winstone, Emily Mortimer, Jude Law, Christopher Lee

Summary: A boy who lives alone in a Paris railway station and runs the station’s clocks strikes up an interesting relationship with the owner of a toy shop and his adopted granddaughter.

100-Word Review: The film is a visually stunning love letter to the movies and quite enjoyable, though I still prefer The Artist. I enjoyed the friendship between Hugo and Isabelle, a bond between a boy and a girl that seems purely platonic (a rare sight in movies). I originally thought that he character played by Sacha Baron Cohen would scrape the boundaries of good taste and I was concerned that he would be a caricature, but for the most part, he was treated respectfully. On a final note: where the heck is Ben Kingsley’s nomination for Best Supporting Actor? He was excellent.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 1 Comment

ReviewsSketch Comedy Monday: “Customs”

Happy Presidents’ Day! This day is supposed to celebrate the birthdays of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln – two presidents for the price of one. To keep with that tradition, I’m posting two sketches for today’s Sketch Comedy Monday.

The first is from Monty Python’s Flying Circus and it’s about a man trying to smuggle foreign materials from another country. The second is from Mr. Show with Bob and David and it’s about a man trying to smuggle foreign materials from another country.


The two sketches are remarkably similar in set-up, execution, and tone. In both sketches, the person smuggling something through customs becomes increasingly desperate and unable to keep up the lie. The customs officer remains calm and just watches as the smuggler continues to make things worse for himself. At the end, a second person tries to get through customs, with very different results.

I saw the Monty Python sketch before the Mr. Show sketch, and the latter immediately reminded me of the former. Watching the two back-to-back, I’m trying to figure out which one I like more.

The Monty Python sketch is the more absurd of the two (as Monty Python sketches tend to be), since the alarm clock goes off in the suitcase right as the smuggler is talking, and then you hear chiming of church bells at the most inopportune time. The customs officer in the Mr. Show never sees the shampoo filled with baggies of drugs and is, in that way, less silly.

On the other hand, I enjoy watching the way David Cross continues to hang himself by fixating on the word “shampoo” and all of its variants, especially since “shampoo” doesn’t have that many variants. Michael Palin has an assortment of absurd lies in his arsenal, while David Cross can’t get off of the word “shampoo” no matter what he tries. “Don’t try to shampoo a shampoo-er! SHAM…POO!”

I want to give the edge to the Monty Python sketch because John Cleese refuses to believe the smuggler’s confession despite the evidence proving his guilt. Throughout the entire sketch, he’s acting like he knows the smuggler is full of crap, so when he says, “I don’t believe you, sir” with that same deadpan expression, I crack up. He’s contemptuous not because the smuggler is lying so badly, but because he thinks the guy is pretending to be a smuggler and can’t pass as one. It’s so silly!

For that alone, I want to prefer the Monty Python sketch. On the other hand, it’s hard to beat a punchline like, “I was in Italy, and then I took a balloon up my ass to Spain…”

So I’ll leave it to you. Which do you prefer?

Posted in Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment

Reviews100-Word Movie Review (Oscar Edition): The Tree of Life

The Tree of Life

Cast: Brad Pitt, Jessica Chastain, Sean Penn, Hunter McCracken, Fiona Shaw

Summary: A film explores the meaning of life on a micro and macro level. A man looks back at his past and thinks about his relationship with his father.

100-Word Review: I’m sure this film has a lot of deep, profound things to say about masculinity, fatherhood, and stereotypes, and the way our family and our society shape our lives. You’ll have to go elsewhere for a deeper analysis of those issues, because I couldn’t stay awake through this movie. The stylized, impressionistic nature of this film never managed to grab my attention no matter how much I tried. Brad Pitt’s performance was very good and perhaps the most subtle work I’ve seen him do, and Terence Malick should make nature documentaries instead of films that have any sort of narrative.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Blog PostsThoughts from a Pro-Choice Extremist

I am pro-choice.

I am a woman in my twenties who is – as far as I know – physically capable of a) getting pregnant and b) carrying the pregnancy to term.

I currently do not wish to a) get pregnant, b) carry a pregnancy to term, and either c) raise a child or d) give up a child for adoption. That opinion may change when I get older.

At the same time, the thought of terminating an unwanted pregnancy makes me upset.

The thought of becoming pregnant before I was ready to become a mother fills me with approximately the same amount of dread as the idea of terminating a pregnancy. Needless to say, I am conflicted about abortion when it comes to myself, my body, and my life.

I know other women who are similarly conflicted about this issue.

I also know women who are not in the slightest bit conflicted about this issue.

I know some women who categorically do not ever want children and would terminate a pregnancy without regrets. I know some women who want children, but do not ever want to become pregnant for health reasons and would terminate a pregnancy with some regrets. I know some women who do not want to become pregnant and are therefore vigilant with their birth control methods. I know some women who use no form of contraception whatsoever because they believe in letting nature take its course, and would not consider terminating a pregnancy except in the most extreme of circumstances.

In this last group of women, I include women who are opposed to legal abortion and women who support legal abortion. One of my most vivid memories from college is the image of my proudly pregnant friend attending pro-choice rallies and defending a woman’s right to choose as she eagerly awaited the birth of her own child.

I don’t know why each individual woman feels the way she does about abortion and pregnancy. I can’t pretend to know. I don’t understand the individual circumstances of their lives, why some of them would abort and some of them wouldn’t, why some are eager to become parents and others are not. I’m not omniscient or omnipotent.

This is why I am pro-choice.

For this, I am called an extremist.

Liberals, progressives, and people who identify with left-wing politics are often accused of “thinking they know what’s best for people and imposing their will on others.”

I am a liberal progressive who identifies with left-wing politics, and I am readily admitting that I have no idea what people’s lives are like, and therefore trust them to make decisions about their own lives and bodies as they see fit.

For this, I am called an extremist.

I am an extremist for saying, “I don’t know a single thing about your life or circumstances, so I’m leaving those choices up to you, because I trust that you know what’s best for yourself.”

Am I missing something?

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | 8 Comments

Reviews100-Word Movie Review (Oscar Edition): The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

Cast: Rooney Mara, Daniel Craig, Christopher Plummer, Stellan Skarsgard

Summary: A disgraced journalist is asked to solve a murder and disappearance of a young girl and hires a young, antisocial, damaged computer hacker as his research assistant.

100-Word Movie Review: I finally understand the hype about Lisbeth Salander. This is a female character rarely written about in books and rarely seen in films. Rooney Mara captures her fierce nature and vulnerability in equal measure. The story focuses on abuse of women as an overall theme, and raises a question about the depiction of the issue. When a story is critical of rape and sexual abuse but portrays it in such graphic detail, when does it cross a line of criticism into a realm of exploitation and fetishistic fantasy? By the end of the movie, I still don’t know the answer.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Reviews100-Word Movie Reviews (Oscar Edition): The Artist

The Artist

Cast: Jean Dujardin, Berenice Bejo, James Cromwell, John Goodman, Penelope Ann Miller, Missi Pyle, Uggie the Dog

Summary: A silent film actor struggles in a world where “talkies” are becoming more popular, and faces his own disappearing relevance. Meanwhile, his younger protege/love interest suddenly gets a career boost with the advent of the talking motion picture.

100-Word Review: A film that has been described as a “love letter to the movies” is equally critical of the industry, showing the ephemeral nature of fame and the way actors can be pigeonholed for the most superficial reasons. A simple beauty mark can change the course of a young woman’s career, and a certain vocal quality of a classically handsome man can turn him into a has-been overnight. The film is also a delightful, lovely story with an impressive blend of comedy, pathos, melodrama, and romance. It defines movie magic, and the dog should have been nominated for Best Supporting Actor.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 1 Comment