Blog Posts“Modern Family’s” Phil Dunphy: Elevating the Man-Child

The man-child is one of my least favorite character tropes. Grown men who can’t be arsed to take control of their lives until a female cipher “character” comes by and redeems him/teaches him how to mature, thus taking the role of his mommy-wife…no, thank you. (This is why I tend to avoid most Judd Apatow projects that aren’t Freaks and Geeks.) The man-child is a character archetype that manages to be insulting to men and women, and I have no use for characters like that who aren’t Homer Simpson.

This is why I’m so fond of Modern Family’s Phil Dunphy, a character who first seems like a typical man-child, but soon shows himself to be much more complex and well-rounded – a man who has child-like interests and still handles plenty of grown-up responsibilities.

On the surface, Phil Dunphy is a combination of several tired sitcom stereotypes. He’s the childlike adult man, the whipped husband under the control of his nagging wife, the dad who tries too hard to be the “cool parent” to impress his kids. Over time, though, the writers and Ty Burrell showed us several more dimensions of the character, much more well-rounded than initially meets the eye.

One of Phil’s defining traits is an enthusiasm for life. He doesn’t do anything halfway. He tries to walk on a wire, creates elaborate presentations for his real estate business, and when he treats his father-in-law to a massage, he lights sage and incense in the room and gets deeply, spiritually in touch with his role as a masseur. The show treats Phil’s enthusiasm as something to be celebrated and emulated, as he finds joy in almost everything he does.

Another thing I like about Phil’s characterization is that he’s not shown to be a bumbling fool. There are times when he doesn’t know what he’s doing and has to be “rescued” by his more in-control wife, yes, but he’s more than competent in other areas of his life. He’s great at buying presents for people. He’s a good real estate salesman and also turns out to be a truly excellent masseur, so good that he could have turned it into a career if he hadn’t heard the siren song of real estate.

But perhaps my favorite thing about Phil Dunphy is the way he enthusiastically embraces traditionally feminine traits. He likes being the sensitive dad, he takes pride in his massage skills, and talks about his college cheerleading past with affection and pride. He bonds more easily with his son Luke than with either of his daughters, but not because of favoritism – he and Luke just have more in common. He also seems to enjoy female-centric films: when Haley, trying to get out of trouble at college, uses Elle Woods from Legally Blonde as a reference point, Phil angrily responds, “This is real life, Haley, not an excellent movie!”

I was honestly moved by the episode “Virgin Territory,” where he discovers that Haley’s had sex. He doesn’t quite know how to deal with this information, and the show presents his dilemma not as a possessive father who feels like he “owns” his daughter’s virginity, but as the dilemma of a confused parent who isn’t ready to hear that his oldest child is growing up. He also seems to realize right away that this problem is his problem, not Haley’s, and he manages to communicate (through coded language) that he trusts her to make her own choices. If only more fathers (on TV and in general) were as supportive of their daughters’ sexual choices as Phil is of Haley’s.

Phil Dunphy is a character who manages to be endearingly childlike without being a man-child, a father who enjoys being the “cool parent” and still isn’t afraid to show his kids tough love when they need it, who calls handshakes “man-shakes” and also enjoys cheerleading. He shows that adult men can have a youthful enthusiasm for life while still being a responsible grown-up (most of the time). I hope he starts a new trend of character archetypes so we can finally get a break from the less appealing man-children.

 

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | 4 Comments

Blog PostsIt’s “Impossible” Not to See the White-Centric Point of View

So this is a trailer for the upcoming film, The Impossible, telling the story about the 2004 tsunami:


There are a few title cards in the trailer that provide the necessary background for the story. The trailer helpfully tells you, “In 2004, tragedy struck southeast Asia.”

However, I don’t think those title cards are specific enough. I’d like to revise those title cards so they read, “In 2004, tragedy devastated entire nations, but we’re going to focus on one white family that was on vacation there.”

The Impossible is based on a true story of a real family that was separated during the tsunami and eventually reunited, each family member miraculously surviving. I can easily see why this story would appeal so much to filmmakers. “Family separated, in peril, in a devastated nation that is completely foreign to them” is such a great hook that it’s practically Captain Hook. Who wouldn’t be interested in the story of a family who have to survive in a country that isn’t their own?

On the other hand, this is a real-life tsunami that affected entire nations, that devastated the lives of the citizens who lived there, and the first prominent film about the tragedy is about white people who were staying at a hotel?

Landon Palmer at the Culture Warrior has more to say on this:

“There is no reason to say that this experience wasn’t any less traumatic and devastating for those visiting (regardless of their particular race) than the inhabitants (once again, regardless of their particular race) of any of the affected nations. The problem with The Impossible trailer isn’t the depiction family’s experience of the tragedy itself, but its implications about what happens when, say, the film ends. While watching the trailer for the first time, an image kept appearing in my head of an exhausted, scratched-up family sleeping comfortably on a plane returning them safely to their home of origin. Being able to survive and then leave a tragedy is altogether different than having everything that is familiar, including one’s home, fall apart before your eyes. However, years of uncertain reconstruction and rehabilitation doesn’t fit the formula of a Hollywood ending quite like a welcome return to a home far, far away from moving tectonic plates.”

Or, you can read a briefer, much more blunt article at 8Asians here, titled “The Impossible Trailer Features Pretty White People Surviving Indonesian Tsunami.”

There are some who might say that one can’t judge a film before seeing it, but that’s a whole lot of malarkey. The purpose of trailers is to market the film and let viewers decide whether or not they want to see it. If a person does not want to see The Impossible because they don’t want to see, as my friend put it, “the tsunami from the perspective of the 1%,” that is a legitimate reason to not see the film.

As for me, I will probably see The Impossible. Naomi Watts is likely going to score a Best Actress nomination for the film, and I’m an Oscar junkie who likes to see as many nominated films as possible from the Picture, Director, Acting, and Screenplay categories. The film also looks beautifully shot, and I don’t get the same sense of manipulation and tear-jerking that I see in a lot of movies about real-life tragedies. The Impossible is likely a good movie, if not a very good movie.

Still, I can’t help but feel that the real impossible task is making a movie about tragedies that affect non-white people and expecting the film to get the same attention as one that stars Naomi Watts and Ewan McGregor.

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged , | 12 Comments

Blog PostsWhat’s On Your Thanksgiving Watchlist?

Thanksgiving, that gluttonous holiday I love despite its unsavory origins, is tomorrow. My family’s feast will begin probably at around 3 pm. For the first time, I will assist with the cooking, hoping to do enough to ease my father’s workload (and also to get out of helping with the dishes). And tonight on Thanksgiving Eve, I will partake in some of my favorite Thanksgiving-themed entertainment.

As you know, I’m a big fan of sitcoms and television in general, and there are some classic Thanksgiving TV episodes that I enjoy watching in preparation of the holiday.

How I Met Your Mother, “Slapsgiving” – Marshall and Barney’s “You Just Got Slapped” song makes me laugh, as does Orson Bean as Ted’s imagined version of Robin’s slightly older boyfriend. I also enjoy the poignancy of Ted and Robin trying to force a friendship after a breakup, only to find their friendship restored after a few military-language puns. (“General Knowledge,” “Corporal Punishment,” “Colonel Stuck In My Teeth,” and “Major Buzzkill.”) The episode also feels very Thanksgiving-y with four friends sitting on their butts and getting into drama while one person goes nearly mad doing all of the cooking – and of course, Lily gets to relax afterward as her friends do all of the dishes.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer, “Pangs” – I actually have a lot of problems with this episode. It’s racist, for one thing, with native appropriation and factual inaccuracies about the Chumash people. Angel returns for a pointless cameo and continues with stalking Buffy, only to set up a crossover Angel episode that still infuriates me. I also don’t like that no one but Anya cares about Xander’s mystical syphilis. However, I do enjoy Spike tied to a chair and being a helpless, annoyed puppy without blood, and Giles calling Americans “you bloody colonials.” I also adore Anya’s description of Thanksgiving: “To commemorate a past event, you kill and eat an animal. It’s a ritual sacrifice, with pie.” Ultimately, I enjoy the attempt to put a supernatural spin on Thanksgiving.

Friends, “The One Where Ross Got High” – Let’s face it, no sitcom did Thanksgiving episodes that Friends did. The show had ten Thanksgiving episodes over its run. Two were boring, three were good, and five were great to amazing. My favorite one, even more than Chandler in a box or the Thanksgiving flashbacks, was the one where Ross got high. No Ross/Rachel breakup drama, no Fat Monica jokes, just Ross trying desperately to hide the fact that he once got high in college, Phoebe having weird sex dreams about Mr. Geller and Jacques Cousteau, Rachel accidentally making a half-English trifle and half-shepherd’s pie, the Geller siblings revealing secrets to each other, and Chandler gets a rare triumphant moment when Mrs. Geller tells him how great he is. This episode also has Joey loving Rachel’s terrible dessert, and Ross crying, “It tastes like feet!”

What about you? What are your favorite pieces of Thanksgiving entertainment?

And happy Slapsgiving!

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | 3 Comments

ReviewsBtVS and Consent Issues: Episode 6.11 – “Gone”

[Note: I’m writing a series about consent issues in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. I will post a new entry in this series every month. In this series, I will look at an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer that deals with rape, sexual assault, or consent issues as a main plot point or as a featured event of the episode. I will examine these episodes in chronological order. If, in my writing of this series, you feel that I have skipped an episode that should be a part of this series, feel free to submit a guest post, and I will consider publishing it.]

EPISODES: “Gone”
INCIDENT: Um…invisible sex
PARTICIPANTS: Buffy and Spike

The specifics: The Trio of Doom accidentally turns Buffy invisible. One of the first things she does upon turning invisible is stop by Spike’s crypt. She shoves him and pins him against the wall. He doesn’t know what’s going on until she kisses his neck, and then recognizes her as Buffy. They have sex in his bed while she’s invisible. Then he asks her to leave, saying, “If I can’t have all of you, I’d rather-” then he looks down and says, “Okay, that’s cheating,” implying that she’s now giving him oral sex.

What does this episode say about misogyny and rape culture?

I’m skipping a few categories when writing about this episode because a) I’m not sure this really counts as a consent issue, b) this is the dumbest episode in the series, and c) I need to save up my energy for when I write about “Dead Things” (oy) and “Seeing Red” (OY). But I have seen people talk about this episode as one that makes them uncomfortable because of the way invisible Buffy is sexually aggressive with Spike, so I thought I’d address the issue here.

First of all, I don’t think the writers would have ever attempted an episode where Spike was the one who turned invisible and shoved Buffy against a wall. (They did attempt an episode where he tried to rape her on her bathroom floor, but that’s a few posts from now.) With the genders reversed and Spike’s history of stalking, invisible Spike shoving Buffy against a wall and ripping her shirt open would not be played for comedy. That would come across as assault. That probably would be assault.

Yet I have a hard time categorizing Buffy’s behavior as assault – not because she’s a woman, but because of the history between her and Spike. This seems to fall in the same pattern that she and Spike have established so far. He follows her, she rejects him, he gets annoyed and promises that she’ll come to him eventually, and then she comes to him.

I also don’t see Spike refusing the first time, when she shoves him against the wall. He is an active participant in that sex, even if he doesn’t feel great about it afterwards. When he says that he doesn’t want her unless he can have “all of her,” and she shuts him up by going down on him – well, I’m not sure what to make of that. A part of me wants to question if this is really fair to Spike and if his wishes are being ignored here, or if it’s fair of Buffy to assume that he didn’t really mean that he didn’t want it. The other part of me doesn’t want to talk about this episode anymore because it’s SO dumb, the dumbest episode ever, and would rather let the readers decide.

What do you make of this episode when analyzing the consent issues at play?

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Blog Posts“Oh No, My Period! Let’s Nuke England!”

I’m not a huge fan of menstruation humor in sitcoms. Most period jokes are centered on the “bitches be crazy, amiritie?” punchline. This was lampooned in 30 Rock in the classic episode, “TGS Hates Women,” where Jenna played a series of historical and important women who made irrational choices when they suddenly got their periods (clip here). Period humor usually shows how long-suffering men have to put up with the crazy women in their lives going even crazier when their hormones go haywire.

In fact, menstruation plots on sitcoms usually follow a very particular pattern: female character acts weepier/more irritable than usual, and the male character is more sensitive than usual because he’s afraid female character will eviscerate him if he says or does the wrong thing. The male character either says/does the wrong thing and the female character snaps at him, OR the female character realizes that the male character is being extra sensitive due to her period and then gets a) furious with him for treating her delicately, or b) overwhelmed with emotion because the male character was being sensitive for a change.

That’s why I was reluctant to watch this week’s episode of New Girl. I love FOX’s entire Tuesday night lineup, but rarely watch the episodes on the night they air, and I tend to catch up on Raising Hope, Ben and Kate, New Girl, and The Mindy Project by the time I go to bed on Thursday. I saw that the New Girl episode was called “Menzies” and felt a sense of dread – would this be another “bitches be crazy” period episode?

As it turned out, yes. And no.

Jess was definitely more irritable than usual while on her period, and she openly sobbed during a job interview when she saw a picture of a puppy sitting in a teacup, but Nick soon realized that Jess’s period was the smokescreen to hide what was really going on with her: she was still depressed over losing her job, and the depression was exacerbated because she’s been unemployed for several months now. Her period didn’t invent irritable or weepy emotions out of nowhere; they simply brought those repressed emotions to the surface.

This is the aspect of the menstruation cycle that a lot of men and male writers simply don’t get. Women don’t become completely different people when they’re on their periods, or become irritable or weepy over issues that normally wouldn’t bother us. Our emotions are often heightened, but not invented. A good friend of mine once broke down in tears after a stressful work event that didn’t go the way she wanted it to, and she blamed her period for making her cry, but she would have felt upset otherwise. The stressful work event had been on her mind for a very long time, and while she was feeling crampy and bloated, she lost her ability to swallow her emotions and hide behind a few sarcastic comments.

Such was the same for Jess: she broke down and snapped at her roommates, but probably wouldn’t have done so if she weren’t feeling depressed and lost at a critical juncture in her life.

“Menzies” was also successful because Nick wasn’t portrayed as the long-suffering, put-upon man who has to deal with his woman’s problem. He wasn’t able to help Jess until he went through his own period (pun intended) of personal journey. He teased Jess for being irrational and angry during her period, and she quickly pointed out that he’s irrational and angry all the time, and we got treated to a series of flashbacks that proved her point. Nick got through to Jess not because he was the rational man and she was the crazy-bitch-be-crazy, but because he found a way to relate to her as a friend.

Even Winston’s story had a surprise twist. He claimed he was also on his period and having “sympathy cramps” because of Jess’s cycle, but soon confessed that he didn’t want to address his post-breakup depression. (Schmidt was the only roommate who didn’t have any anger/weepy moments in the episode, and I enjoy watching Schmidt as the most emotionally stable roommate of the group, since it’s a role he rarely gets to play.) His “alpha female” theory was amusing enough, and even funnier when he admitted that he was faking everything.

For me, the latest episode of New Girl was an example of menstruation humor done well. It focused on Jess’s feelings and didn’t dismiss her as a completely irrational being just because she had a few irrational moments. Period-related humor can be very funny IF writers focus on the female character’s emotions – NOT how the female character’s emotions affect the male characters around her, but how they affect her. Because I’ll be blunt – I’m not interested in examining how men are affected by women’s times of the month. They have to deal with a few weepy moments or blunt comments? We have to deal with our uteri being twisted into knots and stomped on. Focus on the woman’s experiences, and menstruation humor can be very funny indeed.

 

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | 1 Comment

Blog PostsWomen Doctors: Professionally Competent, Messy Personal Lives

You know what I’d like to see more of on television? Stories about women who are successful in their professional lives, but whose personal lives are a complete mess. I especially want to see more of these stories about female doctors.

Take Emily Owens, M.D., for example. Starring Mamie Gummer, Emily Owens, M.D. tells the story of a medical intern who discovers that life in a hospital is just like high school. In the first episode, she confesses to her old high school crush that she likes him only to be shot down, and realizes that her high school nemesis is interested in her high school crush, but she also diagnoses a condition and performs a life-saving procedure during her first day on the job.

Or let’s look at Mindy Kaling’s new sitcom. The Mindy Project, recently picked up for a full season, tells the story of Mindy Lahiri, a gynecologist whose dating life is a mess. In the first episode of the show, she rudely interrupts an ex-boyfriend’s wedding and drives a bicycle into a pool, but by the end of the pilot, she’s heroically delivering a baby to a patient who doesn’t have health insurance – even interrupting a date to do it.

Or let’s go back in time a few years to a show called Grey’s Anatomy, the drama that won’t die (even when most of its characters do). Ellen Pompeo plays Meredith Grey, an intern who accidentally sleeps with her boss the night before her first day. (By “accidentally sleep with,” I mean that the sex was intentional, but she did not know the man was her boss.) She struggles with a patient, but gets a sexy love interest and a guy crushing on her forlornly from the minute he meets her. She’s also the intern who makes the miraculous discovery of what’s wrong with her patient, and figures out how to help a fellow intern’s patient.

Now, pretend you’ve been living under a pop culture rock for the last few years and know nothing about these three shows or the actresses who play these characters. Based just on the descriptions, would you be able to tell which program was the satire/comedy and which two programs took the “professionally skilled, personal mess” trope seriously?

…Okay, so maybe the bicycle in the pool was the giveaway. Fair enough. The point remains that television continues to have a problem with professional women. Showrunners don’t seem to know how to write professional women characters without turning them into neurotic messes who can control nothing about their personal lives, and lately, female doctors are getting the brunt of that particular cliche.

I like comparing these female doctor characters to a character like House on House, M.D. or Dr. Perry Cox on Scrubs (who has been compared to House by other characters on Scrubs, amusingly enough). These men are professional geniuses whose personal lives are also fraught with drama, but we’d never call them neurotic. They’re curmudgeonly assholes who bark perfectly crafted sarcasm at their professional inferiors, colleagues, and bosses. Their personal lives are messes because they’re misanthropic, or because they’re masking years of built-up pain. Women doctors have messy personal lives because they overanalyze and are neurotic and always pick the wrong men.

I don’t know if showrunners write women doctors this way because they lack imagination, or because they’ve internalized sexist stereotypes, or because they don’t know how else to make a professionally competent women sympathetic to an audience. “We’ve got a woman doctor here, because women can be doctors now, but women who are TOO put-together will be a turnoff, so we’ll make her a mess outside of work! INSTANT EMPATHY!”

Fortunately, Mindy Kaling is aware of this cliche, and the episodes of The Mindy Project following the pilot have veered away from “professionally competent, personally messy” plots.Show-Mindy is often portrayed as less neurotic and more of a jerk, and Kaling is more interested in making the character funny than making her likable. Show-Mindy is several steps in the right direction, and I hope we start seeing more characters like her, soon.

But not too soon, because I want there to still be a market for my own pilot about a professionally competent, neurotic female doctor. Doctor Love tells the story of Hilarie Love, a young physician who can’t seem to get her personal life together. In the pilot episode, Hilarie goes on her first date since high school, where her prom date stood her up to go have sex with the cheerleader. Unfortunately, she winds up wearing an outfit where none of the clothes match, and gets so nervous that she throws up on her date in the middle of a restaurant, and almost accidentally kills him when she stands up and knocks the table on him. Then she gets called into work, and performs a miraculous, life-saving surgery (even though she’s not a surgeon) on a young blind boy who’s been shot, removing the bullet with her bare hands and donating her own blood to rejuvenate the child. This catches the attention of a handsome attending physician who finds her competent and pretty, and is still intrigued by Hilarie even after she throws up on him, too.

What do you think? Do we have a hit?

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | 5 Comments

Blog PostsStoneybrook Revisited: BSC #29-#31, Super Special #3

#29 – Mallory and the Mystery Diary
Without a doubt, this is the most pointless book in the series so far. They find a diary in a trunk in Stacey’s attic. Mallory is obsessed with the diary because it’s like one hundred years old OMG. And it turns out to belong to Old Hickory’s granddaughter. And Old Hickory had a portrait of his daughter that was painted over. The baby-sitters are all fascinated by this mystery, especially Mallory, who literally can’t get to sleep because she’s so obsessed with solving this mystery, and oh my god not a single one of your readers give the tiniest infinitesimal shit.

This is a book that makes me doubt Ann M. Martin’s wealth of experience baby-sitting, because none of the characters come across as real teenage girls at all (except Kristy, which I’ll get back to in a minute). Every single one of the BSC members, aged eleven to thirteen, can’t stop thinking about this dumb mystery. Meanwhile, nine-year-old Vanessa Pike is more interested in the old clothes and funky jewelry she finds in Stacey’s attic. Why is Vanessa Pike the only one acting like an actual girl?

Mallory and the Mystery Diary is the fifth mystery-posing-as-a-normal-book in the series. The BSC mystery spinoff series didn’t happen until around book #46 of the original series. These books go a long way in explaining why Claudia is such a fan of Nancy Drew, though. Claudia is obviously a fan of Nancy Drew because Ann M. Martin is a fan of Nancy Drew, and she uses her baby-sitter characters to act as pale copies of Nancy Drew.

Anyway, the only remotely enjoyable thing about this book is Kristy trying to run a seance as Madame Kristin, before admitting that she thinks seances are stupid. You know, Kristy is starting to grow on me. She’s a bossy little jerk most of the time, but I can usually count on her to make me laugh at least once a book, even if I’m usually laughing at her, and she was the only non-boring thing in this one. I’m also starting to see why everyone thinks Mal is such a dork, because Mal is SUCH a dork.

Super Special #3 – Baby-sitters Winter Vacation
So, each super special is narrated by all of the baby-sitters in alternating chapters. Instead of simply taking turns narrating the book, though, Ann M. and her ghostwriters invent a reason for each girl to write a journal cataloging the events of the book. In the first super special, Kristy was collecting their journals to put together a present for her mom and stepdad as a thank you for taking them on a cruise (whatever). In the second super special, Stacey was collecting their journals as a keepsake and memory of her Stoneybrook friends as she went back to New York (okay, I can accept that). In this one, Mary Anne wants to put together a book for Logan about her and her friends’ trip so he can read about it when he gets back from Aruba (WHAT-EVER).

Usually, I am Team Mary Anne in any Mary Anne/Logan plots, but come ON, M.A. Why on earth do you think a thirteen-year-old boy would want to read a bunch of diary entries written by seven thirteen-year-old girls? What in god’s name made you think that was a good present? For crap’s sake.

For the third super special in a row, Claudia is saddled with the “romance” plot. Martin is worse at writing teen romances than she is at writing mysteries. Poor Claudia. Stacey gets a dose of this, too, and we get to see her AMAZING LOVE with a French guy (of course) develop in the three Stacey-POV chapters.

Mary Anne writes a skit for the kids to perform that is all passive-aggressive and secretly about her and Logan. Jessi has to try very hard not to laugh when she reads it, bless her.

Speaking of Jessi, there’s an uncomfortable plot where she assumes that a rude little girl is racist. It turns out the rude little girl is not racist, but just homesick, and she’s lashing out at all of the baby-sitters, not just Jessi. Jessi learns a Very Special Lesson that not all people that are rude to her are rude because she’s black, and I don’t know why a white author thought this was a good storyline for her one main black character. It’s so awkward.

Also, Kristy almost gets a guy killed when she pressures him into entering a winter sports competition. And a group of elementary school kids get stranded at the resort they’re all staying in, because GOD FORBID the girls ever have an actual vacation that doesn’t involve baby-sitting.

#30 – Mary Anne and the Great Romance
When I was a kid, I didn’t care about any of the romances between the baby-sitters and their boyfriends. The one exception might have been Stacey’s flirtation with Sam Thomas. But I always thought the Mary Anne’s dad/Dawn’s mom story was sweet and pretty adorable. I’m a sucker for stories about grownups who fall in love for a second time, and the setup here is so very The Parent Trap that I have to like it.

Another fun thing about Mary Anne and the Great Romance is that I don’t dislike Dawn! At all! She’s rather funny and sweet in this book. When Mary Anne says that “Gozzie Kunka” is a weird name and Dawn says, “For the longest time, I thought Logan Bruno was a pretty weird name,” I want to throw her a party. Go Dawn!

“If Claud’s fashion sense can be rated as a ten, and Kristy’s a two, I guess I must be about a six. Maybe a seven.” Sidebar about Kristy’s clothes: the characters are always talking about how Kristy is not interested in fashion whatsoever, but is it really fair to say that her fashion sense is a “two?” Her outfits always include jeans and a turtleneck and/or sweater. That’s not going to win her any Best Dressed awards, but it’s almost impossible to screw up that combination. Kristy’s never going to look bad, is what I’m saying. Her clothes will always be presentable.

Marilyn and Carolyn Arnold fight, and the fight is pretty amusing, especially when Marilyn puts tape down the middle of the room and points out that fashionable Carolyn is separated from her dresser. What’s REALLY funny is that Mary Anne doesn’t take this as the obvious sign that it is, and still agrees to share a room with Dawn.

Karen Brewer, meanwhile, sets up her little sister and pretends Emily Michelle did something bad, and somehow she’s less annoying in this exceptionally bratty act. At least someone holds Karen responsible for the shitty thing she did, for a change.

Mary Anne blows up at her father when she realizes that they’ll be moving to Dawn’s house. This moment is noteworthy because Mary Anne hardly ever gets vocally angry with people – except, you know, for at least one time in each book where she’s the narrator.

And then the book actually ends on a “who will catch the bouquet?!” cliffhanger. LOL.

#31 – Dawn’s Wicked Stepsister
And I’m back to hating Dawn after going through a whole book where I mostly found her mostly likable. I knew that couldn’t last.

First, Dawn is all pissy because Mary Anne caught the bouquet at Dawn’s mother’s wedding, and later on she’s grumpy because Mary Anne gets a sitting job over her.

Second, Dawn is totally unsympathetic and rude about Mary Anne not wanting to leave the house she grew up in. Dawn has her fantasy of the perfect blended family, see, and Mary Anne being whiny about having to move ruins Dawn’s fantasy. You’d think that a girl who was forced to move across the country from the house SHE grew up in would be a little more sympathetic about seeing her friend go through the same thing, but no.

Third, she switches Richard’s socks in the drawer because she’s annoyed with Mary Anne. Fuck you, Dawn. Richard Spier is a dear man and you don’t deserve him as your stepfather.

Fourth, when Dawn decides that she and Mary Anne sharing a room is a bad idea, her response is not to TALK to her favoritest stepsister about it, but to scare Mary Anne out of the room. And she’s then PROUD of herself for doing it. And the reason she doesn’t talk to Mary Anne about the problem isn’t because she’s worried about hurting Mary Anne’s feelings, but because she DOESN’T WANT TO ADMIT SHE WAS WRONG.

She is such a total asshole. Mary Anne has plenty of rude moments in the book, too, but scaring your supposed favorite sister into leaving your room is the height of assholery.

She’s also really fucking stupid, too, when she doesn’t understand why she can get along with Mary Anne half the time but not get along with her other times. “Is this what having a sister is all about?” Dawn, you have a brother. Sometimes you and Jeff get along and other times you don’t. How can you be that surprised when your relationship with Mary Anne is similar?

God bless Claudia for being all “Sis?” when Dawn calls Mary Anne “sis.” God bless her.

Anyway, the babysitting subplot where all the Pike kids are sick at the same time is one of the more amusing babysitting plots, and I enjoyed those chapters.

The next book is Kristy and the Secret of Susan, and I’ll be writing a separate post about that, because autism.

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Blog PostsLet There Be Light

We have power and life can slowly return to normal. I’m relieved that the worst we suffered was not having light and heat for 12 days. It hasn’t been easy, not being able to work or make money for two weeks, but many people are much worse off than we are and I’m grateful for my luck.

Unfortunately, I won’t be able to go to the city to see Bloody Lullabies for Brave Women tonight, because transportation is still close to impossible around here. My friend will be reviewing it, though, and I’ll post a link to her review when she writes it.

So, what’s been happening these past few weeks other than a devastating hurricane?

– While I was unable to update my blog, I got three comments on my recent Lena Dunham post, each posted a minute apart from each other at 2:55, 2:56, and 2:57 PM. You can’t see them because I didn’t approve the comments in my moderation queue, but while three different usernames were used, they all came from the same IP address. Someone REALLY WANTED to tell me that I was, in fact, jus jellus of Lena Dunham, and needed to tell me three times. Oy, people.

– I took my brothers to a few movies after we drove far enough to find a town without power, and we saw Cloud Atlas and Flight. Cloud Atlas is one of my favorite books and I thought the movie adaptation was pretty good – I give it a B+. I didn’t like some of the changes to the story, nor did I care for the emphasis on romantic love, but the movie as a whole was compelling and engrossing. Flight had a stereotypical and unnecessary female character in it and I didn’t buy the ending, but I’m very pleased to see Denzel Washington acting again instead of coasting on his charisma. When he gets his Oscar nomination, it will be well-deserved.

– My friend Louis Peitzman made a video for A is For. You should watch the video, and then donate to A is For.

– Something else big happened. What was it…oh yeah! BARACK OBAMA WON RE-ELECTION AND WE SENT A BUNCH OF AWESOME PRO-CHOICE WOMEN TO CONGRESS. I’ve had my issues with the president and I don’t hold back from criticizing him when I think he deserves it, but I think he’s a good man with a good vision for this country and can accomplish more now that he doesn’t have to worry about re-election. And I’m super psyched for Tammy Baldwin, Tammy Duckworth, Elizabeth Warren, Mazie Hirono, Claire McCaskill, and everyone else I’m forgetting right now. I’m also happy about the advancements in marriage equality. I don’t know about the rest of you, but I feel hopeful for the future for the first time in a long, long time.

Posted in Blog Posts | Tagged | Leave a comment

Blog PostsHurricane Sandy Update

This is the first access I’ve had to the Internet in about a week now, except for the brief periods of time where I could check in with my phone. I’m fine and my family is fine. We still have no power, but we have a cooler and ice and a gas stove that works when we need to cook warm food. Right now I’m using the Internet connection of kind neighbors who are letting us stay with them.

In other words, we are not suffering. We are inconvenienced. I wish I was able to work and earn some money last week, but I have a place to live, all of my worldly possessions, and family and friends who are alive and healthy.

I hope the same is true for those of you who are reading this. If not, let me extend my deepest condolences for your losses.

Posting will be light until we get our power back, but I wanted to let you all know that things are mostly OK here. Thanks for reading.

Posted in Blog Posts | Leave a comment

ReviewsLady T Recommends “Bloody Lullabies for Brave Women”

For this edition of “Lady T Recommends,” I’m not going to point you towards a Kickstarter or Indiegogo campaign. I’m going to point you towards a play already in production, a play called Bloody Lullabies for Brave Women that will premiere in Brooklyn, New York to benefit the New York Abortion Access Fund.

I’ve mentioned several times that reproductive rights are very important to me as a political and personal cause. Bloody Lullabies for Brave Women is a play about abortion that will address this subject by focusing on “the process women go through when having an abortion instead of focusing on the decision to have one.” My friend Carey Purcell writes extensively about this play on her theatre site in an interview with the producer and writer of the play:

“Huba, who is from Canada, described the two-party political system of America and its approach to health care and reproductive rights as ‘boggling her mind.’ She expressed surprise that a person’s opinion on reproductive rights can be defining of their political stance, saying reproductive rights signify much more than whether one is conservative or liberal.

‘It’s connected to health care. It’s connected to environmental justice, immigration…That’s why I think in many ways this show opens the dialogue for many different discussions,” she said. ‘When it comes down to it, it’s really about health care and how we get the services we need in this country.’

As she watched and read about the debate over reproductive rights, Eraslan described the tipping point as being when “the left wing began playing in the right wing’s ballfield” and justifying the need for an abortion. Citing stories about upper middle class white women who were married and required an abortion for medical reasons, she described the dialogue surrounding ‘good’ abortions and ‘bad’ ones, with ‘good’ abortions depicted as being needed by a married woman who, for a medical reason, is forced to abort the child she wants to carry to term and ‘bad’ abortions portrayed as being needed by unmarried teenagers who are sexually promiscuous.”

I will be seeing this play on November 3rd. I have reviewed several Off-Off-Broadway plays on my blog, and almost all of them were free of charge – a courtesy that is customary for members of the press. I did not request press tickets for Bloody Lullabies for Brave Women and instead paid the ticket price, because all proceeds from this play benefit the New York Abortion Access Fund, an organization that benefits low-income women in need of an abortion.

If you live in the New York area, or know like-minded people in the New York area, please tell them about this play. It will run from November 1-November 5 at Magic Futurebox at 55 33rd St., 4th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11232. Here is a link to the address to purchase tickets: http://www.magicfuturebox.com/bloody-lullabies-for-brave-wom/.

Posted in Reviews | Tagged , | 2 Comments