The man-child is one of my least favorite character tropes. Grown men who can’t be arsed to take control of their lives until a female cipher “character” comes by and redeems him/teaches him how to mature, thus taking the role of his mommy-wife…no, thank you. (This is why I tend to avoid most Judd Apatow projects that aren’t Freaks and Geeks.) The man-child is a character archetype that manages to be insulting to men and women, and I have no use for characters like that who aren’t Homer Simpson.
This is why I’m so fond of Modern Family’s Phil Dunphy, a character who first seems like a typical man-child, but soon shows himself to be much more complex and well-rounded – a man who has child-like interests and still handles plenty of grown-up responsibilities.
On the surface, Phil Dunphy is a combination of several tired sitcom stereotypes. He’s the childlike adult man, the whipped husband under the control of his nagging wife, the dad who tries too hard to be the “cool parent” to impress his kids. Over time, though, the writers and Ty Burrell showed us several more dimensions of the character, much more well-rounded than initially meets the eye.
One of Phil’s defining traits is an enthusiasm for life. He doesn’t do anything halfway. He tries to walk on a wire, creates elaborate presentations for his real estate business, and when he treats his father-in-law to a massage, he lights sage and incense in the room and gets deeply, spiritually in touch with his role as a masseur. The show treats Phil’s enthusiasm as something to be celebrated and emulated, as he finds joy in almost everything he does.
Another thing I like about Phil’s characterization is that he’s not shown to be a bumbling fool. There are times when he doesn’t know what he’s doing and has to be “rescued” by his more in-control wife, yes, but he’s more than competent in other areas of his life. He’s great at buying presents for people. He’s a good real estate salesman and also turns out to be a truly excellent masseur, so good that he could have turned it into a career if he hadn’t heard the siren song of real estate.
But perhaps my favorite thing about Phil Dunphy is the way he enthusiastically embraces traditionally feminine traits. He likes being the sensitive dad, he takes pride in his massage skills, and talks about his college cheerleading past with affection and pride. He bonds more easily with his son Luke than with either of his daughters, but not because of favoritism – he and Luke just have more in common. He also seems to enjoy female-centric films: when Haley, trying to get out of trouble at college, uses Elle Woods from Legally Blonde as a reference point, Phil angrily responds, “This is real life, Haley, not an excellent movie!”
I was honestly moved by the episode “Virgin Territory,” where he discovers that Haley’s had sex. He doesn’t quite know how to deal with this information, and the show presents his dilemma not as a possessive father who feels like he “owns” his daughter’s virginity, but as the dilemma of a confused parent who isn’t ready to hear that his oldest child is growing up. He also seems to realize right away that this problem is his problem, not Haley’s, and he manages to communicate (through coded language) that he trusts her to make her own choices. If only more fathers (on TV and in general) were as supportive of their daughters’ sexual choices as Phil is of Haley’s.
Phil Dunphy is a character who manages to be endearingly childlike without being a man-child, a father who enjoys being the “cool parent” and still isn’t afraid to show his kids tough love when they need it, who calls handshakes “man-shakes” and also enjoys cheerleading. He shows that adult men can have a youthful enthusiasm for life while still being a responsible grown-up (most of the time). I hope he starts a new trend of character archetypes so we can finally get a break from the less appealing man-children.
I really like Phil Dunphy as a character and this is excellent post on why. I also like Claire too, because even though she’s the more in control wife, they still manage to deviate from the typical stereotype of that, as well. She’s shown as being very supportive of Phil (and only “nags” him (which I don’t really count what she does as nagging) out of concern) and her need for control isn’t because she’s always right, but because she’s a bit neurotic. But she can also have fun and she’s not the typical mom figure. I also enjoy that they show her and Phil as a team and that they’ve acknowledged on more than one occassion that they’re both sexual people, which I think’s pretty important.
Claire is a character I have problems with sometimes. I often find her unpleasant, and I can’t tell if it’s because I’ve internalized misogynistic messages about so-called “difficult women” or if…well, or if she really is unpleasant. There are times when I really like her, though – when she embarrasses Alex after Alex manipulates her, or when she tries really hard to tone down her “unlikable” facial expressions and gestures during her debate at city council, or when she laughs with her mouth but not with her eyes. And I love her obsession with Halloween.
I agree that she and Phil make a good team, and I enjoy that they’re shown to still have a pretty hot sex life.
Sometimes you just don’t like characters because you just don’t like them. But it’s good to be conscious enough of cultural prejudice to wonder why you don’t like a character – Heteronormitivity, Homophobia, Racism, or Sexism? – but if what you come up with is ‘They’re just unpleasant’ I’d say it’s a conflicting personality thing. Like when you meet someone in real life and you just can’t stand them when they haven’t actually done anything to you. I think it’s your body’s/mind’s way of telling you that this isn’t someone you want to mimic or (to take the word you used) internalize.
I had seen part of the first episode of this show but had no plans to watch more, after reading this post I gave it another chance and now I’m having a lot of fun watching it. Thank you for (indirectly) getting me to give this show another chance.