Blog PostsThe Best Actress Nominations: The More Things Change…

The 2012 Oscar nominations are out.

Am I the only one who looks at this list of nominees and immediately feels tired?

I saw quite a few movies this year that were interesting, thought-provoking, and immensely entertaining. Except for Bridesmaids, none of those movies are reflected anywhere in the 8 major categories (picture, director, the four acting categories, and the two screenplay categories).

In fact, for the first time in my recent memory, I haven’t seen a single one of the Best Picture nominees. More importantly, the only one I actually want to see is The Artist. There are a few others, such as The Help (because of the amazing cast) and The Descendants (because the Dean from Community co-wrote the screenplay), that I’m mildly interested in seeing, but I just can’t be arsed to care about the rest of them. Maybe I’m too critical or maybe I’ve seen too many movies and they all jumble together in my head, but so many of them – particularly Moneyball and War Horse – seem like stories I have seen a million times already and don’t need to see again.

Now, I don’t expect to be on the same page as the Academy about a lot of issues. They were never going to nominate The Muppets for Best Picture no matter how much I thought it deserved a slot (and it does). But Tilda Swinton’s last-minute snub for We Need to Talk About Kevin surprised me and got me thinking about the types of roles that were nominated for Best Actress this year.

The nominees for Best Actress are Glenn Close in Albert Nobbs, Viola Davis for The Help, Rooney Mara in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, Meryl Streep in The Iron Lady, and Michelle Williams in My Week with Marilyn.

In other words: a cross-dressing character, a black character in a movie that has a white woman saving the day, a kickass woman with a history of brutal sexual abuse, a real-life political figure, and a real-life actress.

Really, the only surprise is that I’m at all surprised.

I have not seen any of these performances and will likely only see Viola Davis’s in The Help, so my snarky commentary is not meant to dismiss or denigrate the work of these actresses or the quality of their performances. I just can’t help noticing that their nominated performances are all for roles that fall into the Academy’s favorite categories for women: gender benders, real-life people, long-suffering nearly saintly black women, and abuse victims.

One could argue that these roles simply represent the types of movies that are being made and the types are roles that are offered to women, but that argument doesn’t hold up as well in the same year that offered us Kirsten Dunst and Charlotte Gainsbourg in Melancholia, Tilda Swinton in We Need to Talk About Kevin, Charlize Theron in Young Adult, and Kristen Wiig in Bridesmaids.

Melancholia gives us two lead actress roles in the same movie: two sisters named Justine and Claire, who first prepare to survive Justine’s wedding, and then prepare to survive the end of the world (spoiler alert!) In the first half of the movie, Justine is the one falling apart and Claire is the one trying to hold her sister together, but their roles reverse by the end of the film. I saw this movie with my boyfriend, and while I liked it, he was mostly bored and thought the characters were suffering from too strong a case of “white people problems.” That comment made me chuckle, but at the very least, I appreciated Melancholia for telling a different type of story than I usually see (and including a gorgeous, visually arresting prologue), and for showing a parallel relationship between two women – even if I didn’t understand why one sister was American and the other was English.

We saw We Need to Talk About Kevin a week later, and Tilda Swinton plays another character that you don’t see very often onscreen: a mother who deals with the aftermath of her son’s murder spree at his high school. The movie gives us a complex, fascinating, twisted relationship between the mother, Eva Khatchadourian, and her son Kevin, where the two are locked in a game of one-upmanship and share rather disturbing similarities in their outlook on life. You walk away wondering if Eva could have done something differently while she was raising Kevin or if he was doomed to be a sociopath no matter what, and no one is left with a clear-cut, easy answer.

Then we have Young Adult, which has a bitter, misanthropic, rather nasty piece of work at its center. Charlize Theron plays Mavis Gary, a ghostwriter for a Sweet Valley High-esque teen novel series, who decides to make a play for her ex-boyfriend, who is married and has a child. She is a highly unpleasant person whose misanthropic diatribes and cutting comments inspire an interesting variety of emotions in the viewer: disgust, secondhand embarrassment, envy, and sometimes, a secret wish to be as blunt as she is.

Finally, we have Kristen Wiig in Bridesmaids, a woman whose life is falling apart right as her best friend is getting married. She clings to her best friend but feels increasingly desperate when another bridesmaid seems to be edging her out. I loved her character because her struggles were sympathetic and the audience is encouraged to feel for her, but we also see how some of her problems are of her own doing: she doesn’t take enough action in her life and plays the victim card too often (as Melissa McCarthy’s character points out to her late in the film). Wiig and her writing partner Annie Mumolo received (deserved) screenplay nominations and Melissa McCarthy received a (deserved) supporting actress nomination, but Wiig was overlooked for a nod in leading actress. This isn’t surprising, as the Academy is biased against comedy and tend to only throw comedy a bone in the supporting actor/actress categories or in screenplay (Juno being the most recent exception in my memory), but it’s still a shame. If McCarthy stole the movie, Wiig still had to carry it, and she did it marvelously. She was frequently hilarious and poignant, doing great physical comedy while also showing humanity and vulnerability.

All of these actresses were lauded by critics for their performances in those films, but none of them earned a Best Actress nomination – not even Tilda Swinton, who had earned a SAG and Golden Globe nomination.

I can’t pretend to know exactly why the nominations are what they are. I’ve only seen female performances that were snubbed, not the ones that were nominated. Yet I can’t shake the feeling that I’ve seen this story play out many times before.

One (seemingly) common thread between the Best Actress-nominated roles is a story about a woman struggling against adversity in some way – Glenn Close against sexism, Viola Davis against racism and sexism, Michelle Williams against sexism and perception, Meryl Streep against sexism and political discrimination, Rooney Mara against sexism.

As a feminist, I know I’m supposed to want to see movies about women struggling against THE PATRIARCHY AND STEREOTYPES or whatever.

But sometimes, I get seriously tired of those stories. I want more stories about characters like Eva Khatchadourian and Mavis Gary and Annie Walker, who aren’t struggling against THE SYSTEM so much. Rather, they’re locked in battles with another person, or even with themselves. Their stories aren’t grand, sweeping statements about The Way Women are Perceived in Society – those elements are slightly at play but don’t make up the main thrust of the story.

I want more movies about women who are allowed to fuck up as much as men do, who are not particularly likable, and who are partially responsible for creating their own pain.

In a strange way, I think a story not having an explicit feminist statement can be the most feminist statement of all.

This entry was posted in Blog Posts and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Best Actress Nominations: The More Things Change…

  1. Thalia says:

    I haven’t been keeping up with films as much as I should be but I was reading an article on the Good Men Project about the Bechdel Test and the author, a black male, proposed a Bechdel Black Test for movies wherein the criteria was, two black characters, conversing, without talking about being black or using racial slurs.

    The relation to what you were saying is that I don’t think the message about whatever they’re struggling against needs to be overt – every character becomes, at their core, a representative of their race/sex/religion or defined only by that one label. Sometimes, seeing women just be people, or black people just be people is all that’s needed.

    One of the topics of discussion in my race and culture class was about whether the anti-racism sentiments had just forced racist actions and thoughts to become more subtle and covert. The corollary is, did the drive toward acceptance mean that every person of a minority group become nothing more than their minority label? Hollywood wants to show it’s totes cool with everything – so we often get grand tales about what hard struggles these individuals/groups face, but rarely stories about them as people.

    Sorry, that was a ramble.

    • Lady T says:

      I haven’t been keeping up with films as much as I should be but I was reading an article on the Good Men Project about the Bechdel Test and the author, a black male, proposed a Bechdel Black Test for movies wherein the criteria was, two black characters, conversing, without talking about being black or using racial slurs.

      I like this idea a lot and I think it could be used for just about any marginalized group. I don’t know if you’ve heard of it, but The Misadventures of an Awkward Black Girl is a web series that passes both the Bechdel test and Black Bechdel test and is really funny to boot. Issues of race are discussed, but not in every moment.

      Sometimes, seeing women just be people, or black people just be people is all that’s needed.

      Yes, exactly.

      The corollary is, did the drive toward acceptance mean that every person of a minority group become nothing more than their minority label? Hollywood wants to show it’s totes cool with everything – so we often get grand tales about what hard struggles these individuals/groups face, but rarely stories about them as people.

      I think there’s something to that, yeah. I also think your comment about Hollywood is spot-on. I don’t think a lot of people in charge are interested in telling stories about women or people of color because they really care about those stories – they want to pat themselves on the back about How Far They’ve Come (and then continue to make movies about white men).

  2. Evelina says:

    “In a strange way, I think a story not having an explicit feminist statement can be the most feminist statement of all.”

    Word.

    I don’t think it’s strange at all. I feel that the strongest women characters in stories/movies/etc. show them being themselves and fighting their battles because of who they are. In other words, what you said – but I don’t think I can be as eloquent as you, haha.

    • Lady T says:

      Thanks. I am happy that there are movies like The Iron Lady that specifically address feminist issues and what it’s like to be a woman in a man’s world – but there’s also something to be said for women just existing as women.

  3. This might be one of my favorite pieces by you at least vis a vis feminism in media. Because man is it true, this year has been if anything a particularly strong one for actresses, and roles for women and yet the Academy did opt for their cliche comfort zone of female parts, I’m sure they were gravely disappointed not a single hooker with a heart of gold was available to vote for.

    And I also can’t get over Melancholia and Kiki/Charlotte being so thoroughly ignored, not just by Oscar but by most everyone. There is something so fascinating to me about Lars, in that one of the most famous of misogynists is also one of if not THE most feminist directors working today. Almost all his films have female protagonists, almost all confront or present a stereotypical female archetype only to explode, critique, or transform it. Lars is not unjustly labled a misogynist, but I frequently say that’s too narrow a view, as he hates EVERYONE, not just women, and I think Melancholia, is actually the first of all his films that has even a winkle of uncut human compassion in it (but of course only because the world is about to end). He is such a trip.

    Bah I still haven’t seen Young Adult. Damn it.

    • Lady T says:

      I’m sure they were gravely disappointed not a single hooker with a heart of gold was available to vote for.

      Well, there are two movies about Linda Lovelace in production now, so I’m sure they’ll get their chance soon! (In a way – porn star/prostitute are not the exact same thing, but yeah).

      Lars is not unjustly labled a misogynist, but I frequently say that’s too narrow a view, as he hates EVERYONE, not just women

      Hee! I wouldn’t know because I don’t think I’ve seen any of his other movies, though I’ve heard Breaking the Waves is very good, if depressing as hell.

      Bah I still haven’t seen Young Adult. Damn it.

      SO GOOD. I liked Juno and Ellen Page in it but I think Young Adult is even better and Charlize is just amazing in it.

Leave a Reply